DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLICLY MANAGED ACCREDITED HEALTH SERVICES IN BRAZIL ACCORDING TO THE LEVELS OF THE NATIONAL ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATION (ONA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66649/h0jtzt17Keywords:
National Accreditation Organization (ONA). Public health services. Accreditation levels. Regional inequalities. Quality management.Abstract
Accreditation Organization (ONA). Method: This is a cross-sectional, observational study with a quantitative approach, based on documentary analysis of public records available on the National Accreditation Organization website. All public health services with active accreditation at the time of data collection (December 2025) were included, excluding duplicate, incomplete, suspended, or canceled records. The analyzed variables included accreditation level, State (Federative Unit), type of service, and number of records per category. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using absolute and relative frequencies. Results: A total of 522 accredited public health services were identified. The majority were classified at the Accredited level (Level 1), accounting for 391 services (74.9%), followed by Accredited with Excellence (Level 3), with 90 services (17.2%), and Fully Accredited (Level 2), with 41 services (7.9%). The highest geographic concentration was observed in the state of São Paulo, particularly among Primary Health Care services at the initial accreditation level. Higher accreditation levels were predominantly associated with hospital services and greater care complexity, with lower geographic dispersion. Regional inequalities were identified, with excellence concentrated in states with greater technical and managerial capacity. Conclusion: Public management accreditation in Brazil is predominantly concentrated at the initial level, indicating that progression to higher accreditation levels remains limited. The findings highlight structural and regional disparities and reinforce the need for public policies aimed at strengthening management practices, expanding the culture of quality, and broadening access to accreditation across the country.
References
1- Camillo NRS, Oliveira JLC, Bellucci JA Jr, Cervilheri AH, Haddad MCFL, Matsuda LM.
Accreditation in a public hospital: perceptions of a multidisciplinary team. Rev Bras Enferm.
2016;69(3):423-430. doi:10.1590/0034-7167.2016690306i.
2- Novaes HM. O processo de acreditação dos serviços de saúde. Rev Adm Saúde.
2007;9(36):133-140.
3- Barbosa SB, Roquete FF. Um olhar sobre a acreditação no cenário brasileiro: perfil dos
hospitais acreditados pela Joint Commission International e pela Organização Nacional de
Acreditação. In: Anais do XXIII SEMEAD – Seminários em Administração; 2020 Nov; São Paulo,
SP, Brasil. São Paulo: SEMEAD; 2020. p. 1-18.
4- Corrêa JE, Turrioni JB, Mello CHP, Santos ACO, Silva CES, Almeida FA. Development of a
system measurement model of the Brazilian hospital accreditation system. Int J Environ Res Public
Health. 2018;15(11):2520. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112520.
5- Alves CO, Gomes EC, Santos WJ. Impactos da acreditação hospitalar e as dificuldades para
manter a qualidade nas instituições acreditadas. Rev Cient Gest Hosp. 2019;1(1):49-59.
6- Organização Nacional de Acreditação (ONA). Mapa de acreditações [Internet]. Brasília (DF):
ONA; [citado 2025 dez 13]. Disponível em: https://www.ona.org.br/mapa-de-acreditacoes
7- Corvino Rodrigues R, Rodrigues Franco F, Carbonezi PA, Batista Azambuja V, Marchetti V,
Magera Conceição M. Acreditação hospitalar no contexto brasileiro. J Health Technol.
2022;1(1):e115. doi:10.47820/jht.v1i1.5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 OPEN SCIENCE REVIEW21

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
